[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170310083959.500678746@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:08:02 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.10 039/167] regulator: Fix regulator_summary for deviceless consumers
4.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
commit e42a46b6f52473661ad192f76a128a68fe301df4 upstream.
It is allowed to call regulator_get with a NULL dev argument
(_regulator_get explicitly checks for it) but this causes an error later
when printing /sys/kernel/debug/regulator_summary.
Fix this by explicitly handling "deviceless" consumers in the debugfs code.
Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -4391,12 +4391,13 @@ static void regulator_summary_show_subtr
seq_puts(s, "\n");
list_for_each_entry(consumer, &rdev->consumer_list, list) {
- if (consumer->dev->class == ®ulator_class)
+ if (consumer->dev && consumer->dev->class == ®ulator_class)
continue;
seq_printf(s, "%*s%-*s ",
(level + 1) * 3 + 1, "",
- 30 - (level + 1) * 3, dev_name(consumer->dev));
+ 30 - (level + 1) * 3,
+ consumer->dev ? dev_name(consumer->dev) : "deviceless");
switch (rdev->desc->type) {
case REGULATOR_VOLTAGE:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists