[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170310084002.285669369@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:09:02 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.10 099/167] fuse: add missing FR_FORCE
4.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
commit 2e38bea99a80eab408adee27f873a188d57b76cb upstream.
fuse_file_put() was missing the "force" flag for the RELEASE request when
sending synchronously (fuseblk).
If this flag is not set, then a sync request may be interrupted before it
is dequeued by the userspace filesystem. In this case the OPEN won't be
balanced with a RELEASE.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Fixes: 5a18ec176c93 ("fuse: fix hang of single threaded fuseblk filesystem")
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/fuse/file.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/fs/fuse/file.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ static void fuse_file_put(struct fuse_fi
iput(req->misc.release.inode);
fuse_put_request(ff->fc, req);
} else if (sync) {
+ __set_bit(FR_FORCE, &req->flags);
__clear_bit(FR_BACKGROUND, &req->flags);
fuse_request_send(ff->fc, req);
iput(req->misc.release.inode);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists