| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <58C279B7.2060106@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:02:31 +0800
From: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: "virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org" <virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"qemu-devel@...gnu.org" <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Liang Li <liang.z.li@...el.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Liang Li <liliang324@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v7 kernel 3/5] virtio-balloon: implementation
of VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_CHUNK_TRANSFER
On 03/08/2017 12:01 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:40:28PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
>> From: Liang Li <liang.z.li@...el.com>
>>
>> The implementation of the current virtio-balloon is not very
>> efficient, because the pages are transferred to the host one by one.
>> Here is the breakdown of the time in percentage spent on each
>> step of the balloon inflating process (inflating 7GB of an 8GB
>> idle guest).
>>
>> 1) allocating pages (6.5%)
>> 2) sending PFNs to host (68.3%)
>> 3) address translation (6.1%)
>> 4) madvise (19%)
>>
>> It takes about 4126ms for the inflating process to complete.
>> The above profiling shows that the bottlenecks are stage 2)
>> and stage 4).
>>
>> This patch optimizes step 2) by transfering pages to the host in
>> chunks. A chunk consists of guest physically continuous pages, and
>> it is offered to the host via a base PFN (i.e. the start PFN of
>> those physically continuous pages) and the size (i.e. the total
>> number of the pages). A normal chunk is formated as below:
>> -----------------------------------------------
>> | Base (52 bit) | Size (12 bit)|
>> -----------------------------------------------
>> For large size chunks, an extended chunk format is used:
>> -----------------------------------------------
>> | Base (64 bit) |
>> -----------------------------------------------
>> -----------------------------------------------
>> | Size (64 bit) |
>> -----------------------------------------------
>>
>> By doing so, step 4) can also be optimized by doing address
>> translation and madvise() in chunks rather than page by page.
>>
>> This optimization requires the negotation of a new feature bit,
>> VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_CHUNK_TRANSFER.
>>
>> With this new feature, the above ballooning process takes ~590ms
>> resulting in an improvement of ~85%.
>>
>> TODO: optimize stage 1) by allocating/freeing a chunk of pages
>> instead of a single page each time.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liang Li <liang.z.li@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
>> Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
>> Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
>> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Liang Li <liliang324@...il.com>
>> Cc: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
> Does this pass sparse? I see some endian-ness issues here.
"pass sparse"- what does that mean?
I didn't see any complaints from "make" on my machine.
>> ---
>> drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 351 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 323 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
>> index f59cb4f..4416370 100644
>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
>> @@ -42,6 +42,10 @@
>> #define OOM_VBALLOON_DEFAULT_PAGES 256
>> #define VIRTBALLOON_OOM_NOTIFY_PRIORITY 80
>>
>> +#define PAGE_BMAP_SIZE (8 * PAGE_SIZE)
>> +#define PFNS_PER_PAGE_BMAP (PAGE_BMAP_SIZE * BITS_PER_BYTE)
>> +#define PAGE_BMAP_COUNT_MAX 32
>> +
>> static int oom_pages = OOM_VBALLOON_DEFAULT_PAGES;
>> module_param(oom_pages, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR);
>> MODULE_PARM_DESC(oom_pages, "pages to free on OOM");
>> @@ -50,6 +54,16 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(oom_pages, "pages to free on OOM");
>> static struct vfsmount *balloon_mnt;
>> #endif
>>
>> +struct balloon_page_chunk {
>> + __le64 base : 52;
>> + __le64 size : 12;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct balloon_page_chunk_ext {
>> + __le64 base;
>> + __le64 size;
>> +};
>> +
>> struct virtio_balloon {
>> struct virtio_device *vdev;
>> struct virtqueue *inflate_vq, *deflate_vq, *stats_vq;
>> @@ -67,6 +81,20 @@ struct virtio_balloon {
>>
>> /* Number of balloon pages we've told the Host we're not using. */
>> unsigned int num_pages;
>> + /* Pointer to the response header. */
>> + struct virtio_balloon_resp_hdr resp_hdr;
>> + /* Pointer to the start address of response data. */
>> + __le64 *resp_data;
>> + /* Size of response data buffer. */
>> + unsigned int resp_buf_size;
>> + /* Pointer offset of the response data. */
>> + unsigned int resp_pos;
>> + /* Bitmap used to save the pfns info */
>> + unsigned long *page_bitmap[PAGE_BMAP_COUNT_MAX];
>> + /* Number of split page bitmaps */
>> + unsigned int nr_page_bmap;
>> + /* Used to record the processed pfn range */
>> + unsigned long min_pfn, max_pfn, start_pfn, end_pfn;
>> /*
>> * The pages we've told the Host we're not using are enqueued
>> * at vb_dev_info->pages list.
>> @@ -110,20 +138,180 @@ static void balloon_ack(struct virtqueue *vq)
>> wake_up(&vb->acked);
>> }
>>
>> -static void tell_host(struct virtio_balloon *vb, struct virtqueue *vq)
>> +static inline void init_bmap_pfn_range(struct virtio_balloon *vb)
>> {
>> - struct scatterlist sg;
>> + vb->min_pfn = ULONG_MAX;
>> + vb->max_pfn = 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void update_bmap_pfn_range(struct virtio_balloon *vb,
>> + struct page *page)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long balloon_pfn = page_to_balloon_pfn(page);
>> +
>> + vb->min_pfn = min(balloon_pfn, vb->min_pfn);
>> + vb->max_pfn = max(balloon_pfn, vb->max_pfn);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void extend_page_bitmap(struct virtio_balloon *vb,
>> + unsigned long nr_pfn)
>
> what exactly does this do?
By default, only one page_bmap is allocated.
When there are too many pfns to fit into one page_bmap,
it tries to allocate more page_bmap using this extend_page_bmap() function.
>
>> +{
>> + int i, bmap_count;
>> + unsigned long bmap_len;
>> +
>> + bmap_len = ALIGN(nr_pfn, BITS_PER_LONG) / BITS_PER_BYTE;
>> + bmap_len = ALIGN(bmap_len, PAGE_BMAP_SIZE);
>> + bmap_count = min((int)(bmap_len / PAGE_BMAP_SIZE),
>> + PAGE_BMAP_COUNT_MAX);
>> +
>> + for (i = 1; i < bmap_count; i++) {
>> + vb->page_bitmap[i] = kmalloc(PAGE_BMAP_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (vb->page_bitmap[i])
>> + vb->nr_page_bmap++;
>> + else
>> + break;
> seems to fail silently ...
I think here it is fine whether the page_bmap extension succeeds or
silently fails.
It doesn't affect the correctness of the implementation - the page_bmap
is always
used through vb->nr_page_bmap. Maybe the code logic is still a little
fuzzy. I plan
to re-write most of the implementation to make it clearer.
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void free_extended_page_bitmap(struct virtio_balloon *vb)
>> +{
>> + int i, bmap_count = vb->nr_page_bmap;
>> +
>> + for (i = 1; i < bmap_count; i++) {
>> + kfree(vb->page_bitmap[i]);
>> + vb->page_bitmap[i] = NULL;
>> + vb->nr_page_bmap--;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void kfree_page_bitmap(struct virtio_balloon *vb)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < vb->nr_page_bmap; i++)
>> + kfree(vb->page_bitmap[i]);
>> +}
>> +
> A very confusing name. pls don't start with kfree.
Ok. I'll simply call it free_page_bmap()
>
>> +static void clear_page_bitmap(struct virtio_balloon *vb)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < vb->nr_page_bmap; i++)
>> + memset(vb->page_bitmap[i], 0, PAGE_BMAP_SIZE);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void send_resp_data(struct virtio_balloon *vb, struct virtqueue *vq,
>> + bool busy_wait)
>> +{
>> + struct scatterlist sg[2];
>> + struct virtio_balloon_resp_hdr *hdr = &vb->resp_hdr;
>> unsigned int len;
>>
>> - sg_init_one(&sg, vb->pfns, sizeof(vb->pfns[0]) * vb->num_pfns);
>> + len = hdr->data_len = vb->resp_pos * sizeof(__le64);
>> + sg_init_table(sg, 2);
>> + sg_set_buf(&sg[0], hdr, sizeof(struct virtio_balloon_resp_hdr));
>> + sg_set_buf(&sg[1], vb->resp_data, len);
>> +
>> + if (virtqueue_add_outbuf(vq, sg, 2, vb, GFP_KERNEL) == 0) {
> !virtqueue_add_outbuf
>
> Also how about making this header linear with pfns?
> This way you can use 1 s/g and avoid mallocs.
Yes, I think it'll be better, thanks.
>> + virtqueue_kick(vq);
>> + if (busy_wait)
>> + while (!virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len)
>> + && !virtqueue_is_broken(vq))
>> + cpu_relax();
>> + else
>> + wait_event(vb->acked, virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len));
>> + vb->resp_pos = 0;
>> + free_extended_page_bitmap(vb);
>> + }
>> +}
>>
>> - /* We should always be able to add one buffer to an empty queue. */
>> - virtqueue_add_outbuf(vq, &sg, 1, vb, GFP_KERNEL);
>> - virtqueue_kick(vq);
>> +static void do_set_resp_bitmap(struct virtio_balloon *vb, unsigned long base,
>> + int size)
>> +{
>> + /* Use the extented chunk format if the size is too large */
>> + if (size > (1 << VIRTIO_BALLOON_CHUNK_SIZE_SHIFT)) {
>> + struct balloon_page_chunk_ext *chunk_ext =
>> + (struct balloon_page_chunk_ext *)(vb->resp_data + vb->resp_pos);
>> + chunk_ext->base = cpu_to_le64(base);
>> + chunk_ext->size = cpu_to_le64(size);
>> + vb->resp_pos += sizeof(vb->resp_pos) / sizeof(*chunk_ext);
>> + } else {
>> + struct balloon_page_chunk *chunk =
>> + (struct balloon_page_chunk *)(vb->resp_data + vb->resp_pos);
>> + chunk->base = cpu_to_le64(base);
>> + chunk->size = cpu_to_le16(size);
>> + vb->resp_pos += sizeof(vb->resp_pos) / sizeof(*chunk);
>> + }
>> +}
>>
>> - /* When host has read buffer, this completes via balloon_ack */
>> - wait_event(vb->acked, virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len));
>> +static void chunking_pages_from_bmap(struct virtio_balloon *vb,
>> + struct virtqueue *vq,
>> + unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long *bitmap,
>> + unsigned long len, bool busy_wait)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long pos = 0, end = len * BITS_PER_BYTE;
>> +
>> + while (pos < end) {
>> + unsigned long one = find_next_bit(bitmap, end, pos);
>> +
>> + if (one < end) {
>> + unsigned long chunk_size, zero;
>> +
>> + zero = find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, end, one + 1);
>> + if (zero >= end)
>> + chunk_size = end - one;
>> + else
>> + chunk_size = zero - one;
>> + if (chunk_size) {
>> + if ((vb->resp_pos + 2) * sizeof(__le64) >
>> + vb->resp_buf_size)
> why + 2? where does sizeof come from?
> Any chance this can be cleaned up using structs sizeof etc?
> or at least commented?
> How am I supposed to figure out all this convoluted pointer math?
Right. I'll take of it in the new version.
>> + send_resp_data(vb, vq, busy_wait);
>> + do_set_resp_bitmap(vb, start_pfn + one, chunk_size);
>> + }
>> + pos = one + chunk_size;
>> + } else
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +}
>>
>> +static void tell_host(struct virtio_balloon *vb, struct virtqueue *vq)
>> +{
>> + if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_CHUNK_TRANSFER)) {
>> + int nr_pfn, nr_used_bmap, i;
>> + unsigned long start_pfn, bmap_len;
>> +
>> + start_pfn = vb->start_pfn;
>> + nr_pfn = vb->end_pfn - start_pfn + 1;
>> + nr_pfn = roundup(nr_pfn, BITS_PER_LONG);
>> + nr_used_bmap = nr_pfn / PFNS_PER_PAGE_BMAP;
> better name here including "page"?
> And bmaps instead of bmap?
Agree. I'll call it page_bmaps.
>> + if (nr_pfn % PFNS_PER_PAGE_BMAP)
>> + nr_used_bmap++;
> Pls just use macros like ALIGN or roundup?
>
>> + bmap_len = nr_pfn / BITS_PER_BYTE;
> I guess we need to round up.
>
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < nr_used_bmap; i++) {
>> + unsigned int bmap_size = PAGE_BMAP_SIZE;
>> +
>> + if (i + 1 == nr_used_bmap)
>> + bmap_size = bmap_len - PAGE_BMAP_SIZE * i;
> So last one is treated speacially? why?
The last one takes the leftover only, so that chunking_pages_from_bmap()
only searches the necessary part of (rather than the entire) the page_bmap.
>> + chunking_pages_from_bmap(vb, vq, start_pfn + i * PFNS_PER_PAGE_BMAP,
>> + vb->page_bitmap[i], bmap_size, false);
>> + }
>> + if (vb->resp_pos > 0)
>> + send_resp_data(vb, vq, false);
>> + } else {
>> + struct scatterlist sg;
>> + unsigned int len;
>> +
>> + sg_init_one(&sg, vb->pfns, sizeof(vb->pfns[0]) * vb->num_pfns);
>> +
>> + /* We should always be able to add one buffer to an
>> + * empty queue
>> + */
> /*
> * Multi-line comments
> * like this.
> */
OK.
>> + virtqueue_add_outbuf(vq, &sg, 1, vb, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + virtqueue_kick(vq);
>> + /* When host has read buffer, this completes via balloon_ack */
>> + wait_event(vb->acked, virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len));
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> static void set_page_pfns(struct virtio_balloon *vb,
>> @@ -138,13 +326,58 @@ static void set_page_pfns(struct virtio_balloon *vb,
>> page_to_balloon_pfn(page) + i);
>> }
>>
>> -static unsigned fill_balloon(struct virtio_balloon *vb, size_t num)
>> +static void set_page_bitmap(struct virtio_balloon *vb,
>> + struct list_head *pages, struct virtqueue *vq)
> align on ( pls.
>
>> +{
>> + unsigned long pfn, pfn_limit;
>> + struct page *page;
>> + bool found;
>> +
>> + vb->min_pfn = rounddown(vb->min_pfn, BITS_PER_LONG);
>> + vb->max_pfn = roundup(vb->max_pfn, BITS_PER_LONG);
>> + pfn_limit = PFNS_PER_PAGE_BMAP * vb->nr_page_bmap;
>> +
>> + if (vb->nr_page_bmap == 1)
>> + extend_page_bitmap(vb, vb->max_pfn - vb->min_pfn + 1);
> how is 1 special?
Thanks. I think "if (vb->nr_page_bmap == 1)" should be removed.
Whenever the current amount of page_bmap is not enough to hold
the amount of pfns, it should try to entend page_bmap.
Best,
Wei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists