lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170310084001.296695270@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:08:40 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH 4.10 077/167] ext4: fix data corruption in data=journal mode

4.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

commit 3b136499e906460919f0d21a49db1aaccf0ae963 upstream.

ext4_journalled_write_end() did not propely handle all the cases when
generic_perform_write() did not copy all the data into the target page
and could mark buffers with uninitialized contents as uptodate and dirty
leading to possible data corruption (which would be quickly fixed by
generic_perform_write() retrying the write but still). Fix the problem
by carefully handling the case when the page that is written to is not
uptodate.

Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/ext4/inode.c |   23 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -1385,7 +1385,9 @@ errout:
  * set the buffer to be dirty, since in data=journalled mode we need
  * to call ext4_handle_dirty_metadata() instead.
  */
-static void zero_new_buffers(struct page *page, unsigned from, unsigned to)
+static void ext4_journalled_zero_new_buffers(handle_t *handle,
+					    struct page *page,
+					    unsigned from, unsigned to)
 {
 	unsigned int block_start = 0, block_end;
 	struct buffer_head *head, *bh;
@@ -1402,7 +1404,7 @@ static void zero_new_buffers(struct page
 					size = min(to, block_end) - start;
 
 					zero_user(page, start, size);
-					set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
+					write_end_fn(handle, bh);
 				}
 				clear_buffer_new(bh);
 			}
@@ -1434,15 +1436,16 @@ static int ext4_journalled_write_end(str
 	if (ext4_has_inline_data(inode))
 		copied = ext4_write_inline_data_end(inode, pos, len,
 						    copied, page);
-	else {
-		if (copied < len) {
-			if (!PageUptodate(page))
-				copied = 0;
-			zero_new_buffers(page, from+copied, to);
-		}
-
+	else if (unlikely(copied < len) && !PageUptodate(page)) {
+		copied = 0;
+		ext4_journalled_zero_new_buffers(handle, page, from, to);
+	} else {
+		if (unlikely(copied < len))
+			ext4_journalled_zero_new_buffers(handle, page,
+							 from + copied, to);
 		ret = ext4_walk_page_buffers(handle, page_buffers(page), from,
-					     to, &partial, write_end_fn);
+					     from + copied, &partial,
+					     write_end_fn);
 		if (!partial)
 			SetPageUptodate(page);
 	}


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ