linux-kernel - Re: "mm: fix lazyfree BUG_ON check in try_to_unmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8e17c4e0-eb64-9910-1406-208e0fb3dd31@suse.cz>
Date:   Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:31:25 +0100
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: "mm: fix lazyfree BUG_ON check in try_to_unmap_one()" build error

On 03/10/2017 01:45 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 01:27:06PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 15:02:26 +0900 Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Sergey reported VM_WARN_ON_ONCE returns void with !CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
>>> so we cannot use it as if's condition unlike WARN_ON.
>>
>> Can we instead fix VM_WARN_ON_ONCE()?
> 
> I thought the direction but the reason to decide WARN_ON_ONCE in this case
> is losing of benefit with using CONFIG_DEBU_VM if we go that way.
> 
> I think the benefit with VM_WARN_ON friends is that it should be completely
> out from the binary in !CONFIG_DEBUG_VM. However, if we fix VM_WARN_ON
> like WARN_ON to !!condition, at least, compiler should generate condition
> check and return so it's not what CONFIG_DEBUG_VM want, IMHO.
> However, if guys believe it's okay to add some instructions to debug VM
> although we disable CONFIG_DEBUG_VM, we can go that way.
> It's a just policy matter. ;-)
> 
> Anyway, Even though we fix VM_WARN_ON_ONCE, in my case, WARN_ON_ONCE is
> better because we should do !!condition regardless of CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> and if so, WARN_ON is more wide coverage than VM_WARN_ON which only works
> with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM.

Agreed. WARN_ON...() can work that way as one can't disable them
(AFAIK), but VM_* variants are optional for overhead reasons.