linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.2 169/199] net: mangle zero checksum in skb_checksum

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lsq.1489146370.81688991@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 10 Mar 2017 11:46:10 +0000
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        "Maciej Żenczykowski" <maze@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "Willem de Bruijn" <willemb@...gle.com>,
        "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 169/199] net: mangle zero checksum in skb_checksum_help()

3.2.87-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 4f2e4ad56a65f3b7d64c258e373cb71e8d2499f4 ]

Sending zero checksum is ok for TCP, but not for UDP.

UDPv6 receiver should by default drop a frame with a 0 checksum,
and UDPv4 would not verify the checksum and might accept a corrupted
packet.

Simply replace such checksum by 0xffff, regardless of transport.

This error was caught on SIT tunnels, but seems generic.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 net/core/dev.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1918,7 +1918,7 @@ int skb_checksum_help(struct sk_buff *sk
 			goto out;
 	}
 
-	*(__sum16 *)(skb->data + offset) = csum_fold(csum);
+	*(__sum16 *)(skb->data + offset) = csum_fold(csum) ?: CSUM_MANGLED_0;
 out_set_summed:
 	skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
 out: