[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-8c8cb30f49b86333d8e036e1945cf1a78c03577e@git.kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 05:47:38 -0800
From: tip-bot for Dou Liyang <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
xiaolong.ye@...el.com, douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com
Subject: [tip:x86/acpi] acpi/processor: Implement DEVICE operator for
processor enumeration
Commit-ID: 8c8cb30f49b86333d8e036e1945cf1a78c03577e
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/8c8cb30f49b86333d8e036e1945cf1a78c03577e
Author: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 16:02:26 +0800
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:41:20 +0100
acpi/processor: Implement DEVICE operator for processor enumeration
ACPI allows to declare processors either with the PROCESSOR or with the
DEVICE operator. The current implementation handles only the PROCESSOR
operator.
On a system which uses the DEVICE operator for processor enumeration the
evaluation fails.
Check for the ACPI type of the ACPI handle and evaluate PROCESSOR and
DEVICE types separately.
Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: guzheng1@...wei.com
Cc: izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com
Cc: lenb@...nel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1488528147-2279-5-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 5d208a9..9a98d7e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -633,25 +633,50 @@ static acpi_status __init acpi_processor_ids_walk(acpi_handle handle,
void **rv)
{
acpi_status status;
+ acpi_object_type acpi_type;
+ unsigned long long uid;
union acpi_object object = { 0 };
struct acpi_buffer buffer = { sizeof(union acpi_object), &object };
- status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, NULL, NULL, &buffer);
+ status = acpi_get_type(handle, &acpi_type);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
- acpi_handle_info(handle, "Not get the processor object\n");
- else
- processor_validated_ids_update(object.processor.proc_id);
+ return false;
+
+ switch (acpi_type) {
+ case ACPI_TYPE_PROCESSOR:
+ status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, NULL, NULL, &buffer);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+ goto err;
+ uid = object.processor.proc_id;
+ break;
+
+ case ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE:
+ status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_UID", NULL, &uid);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+ goto err;
+ break;
+ default:
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ processor_validated_ids_update(uid);
+ return true;
+
+err:
+ acpi_handle_info(handle, "Invalid processor object\n");
+ return false;
- return AE_OK;
}
-static void __init acpi_processor_check_duplicates(void)
+void __init acpi_processor_check_duplicates(void)
{
- /* Search all processor nodes in ACPI namespace */
+ /* check the correctness for all processors in ACPI namespace */
acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_PROCESSOR, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
acpi_processor_ids_walk,
NULL, NULL, NULL);
+ acpi_get_devices(ACPI_PROCESSOR_DEVICE_HID, acpi_processor_ids_walk,
+ NULL, NULL);
}
bool __init acpi_processor_validate_proc_id(int proc_id)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists