lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 11 Mar 2017 21:36:42 +0800
From:   Yisheng Xie <ysxie@...mail.com>
To:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org, mgorman@...e.de,
        vbabka@...e.cz, mhocko@...e.com, riel@...hat.com,
        shakeelb@...gle.com
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        xieyisheng1@...wei.com, hanjunguo@...wei.com, qiuxishi@...wei.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 RFC] mm/vmscan: more restrictive condition for retry in do_try_to_free_pages

From: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com>

When we enter do_try_to_free_pages, the may_thrash is always clear, and
it will retry shrink zones to tap cgroup's reserves memory by setting
may_thrash when the former shrink_zones reclaim nothing.

However, when memcg is disabled or on legacy hierarchy, it should not do
this useless retry at all, for we do not have any cgroup's reserves
memory to tap, and we have already done hard work but made no progress.

To avoid this time costly and useless retrying, add a stub function
may_thrash and return true when memcg is disabled or on legacy
hierarchy.

Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com>
Suggested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
---
v2:
 - more restrictive condition for retry of shrink_zones (restricting
   cgroup_disabled=memory boot option and cgroup legacy hierarchy) - Shakeel

 - add a stub function may_thrash() to avoid compile error or warning.

 - rename subject from "donot retry shrink zones when memcg is disable"
   to "more restrictive condition for retry in do_try_to_free_pages"

Any comment is more than welcome!

Thanks
Yisheng Xie

 mm/vmscan.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index bc8031e..415f800 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -184,6 +184,19 @@ static bool sane_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
 #endif
 	return false;
 }
+
+static bool may_thrash(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+	/*
+	 * When memcg is disabled or on legacy hierarchy, there is no cgroup
+	 * reserves memory to tap.
+	 */
+	if (!cgroup_subsys_enabled(memory_cgrp_subsys) ||
+	    !cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys))
+		return true;
+
+	return sc->may_thrash;
+}
 #else
 static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
 {
@@ -194,6 +207,11 @@ static bool sane_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
 {
 	return true;
 }
+
+static bool may_thrash(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+	return true;
+}
 #endif
 
 /*
@@ -2808,7 +2826,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 		return 1;
 
 	/* Untapped cgroup reserves?  Don't OOM, retry. */
-	if (!sc->may_thrash) {
+	if (!may_thrash(sc)) {
 		sc->priority = initial_priority;
 		sc->may_thrash = 1;
 		goto retry;
-- 
1.9.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ