[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58C3731B.1050200@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:46:35 +0800
From: zhouchengming <zhouchengming1@...wei.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC: <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<miaoxie@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] don't forget to call pd_online_fn when activate policy
On 2017/3/10 23:12, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 03/08/2017 07:20 PM, Zhou Chengming wrote:
>> When we activate policy on the request_queue, we will create policy_date
>> for all the existing blkgs of the request_queue, so we should call
>> pd_init_fn() and pd_online_fn() on these newly created policy_data.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Chengming<zhouchengming1@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> block/blk-cgroup.c | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
>> index 8ba0af7..0dd9e76 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
>> @@ -1254,6 +1254,12 @@ int blkcg_activate_policy(struct request_queue *q,
>> pd->plid = pol->plid;
>> if (pol->pd_init_fn)
>> pol->pd_init_fn(pd);
>> +
>> + if (pol->pd_online_fn) {
>> + spin_lock(blkg->blkcg->lock);
>> + pol->pd_online_fn(pd);
>> + spin_unlock(blkg->blkcg->lock);
>> + }
>
> You didn't even compile this, did you?
>
Sorry for my carelessness. It's a very minor change, so I didn't compile...
I will send a patch-v3 that I have compiled. Sorry again..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists