linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tpm_crb: request and relinquish locality 0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170311081532.qfxwrx3xqjzoppa2@intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:15:32 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc:     tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>, gang.wei@...el.com,
        Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
        Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm_crb: request and relinquish locality 0

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 05:27:09PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 01:58:00AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Added two new callbacks to struct tpm_class_ops:
> > 
> > - request_locality
> > - relinquish_locality
> > 
> > These are called before sending and receiving data from the TPM.
> 
> If we are going to add new ops, I think we should also adjust the
> existing drivers to use this mechanism as well?
> 
> eg tis just calls its request_locality as the first thing in send..
> 
> Jason

Would it be sufficient to adjust tpm_tis in addition to tpm_crb? Those
are the only once where I can edit edit-compile-run cycle.

The original commit I did worked on SKL platform that I tested but fails
on KBL but keeping the locality throughout the transmit makes it stable
on every platform I've tested.

/Jarkko