[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1870069.9aRhgp95Gh@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 18:12:56 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Update pid_params.sample_rate_ns in pid_param_set()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Fix the debugfs interface for PID tuning to actually update
pid_params.sample_rate_ns on PID parameters updates, as changing
pid_params.sample_rate_ms via debugfs has no effect now.
Fixes: a4675fbc4a7a (cpufreq: intel_pstate: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -983,6 +983,7 @@ static void intel_pstate_update_policies
static int pid_param_set(void *data, u64 val)
{
*(u32 *)data = val;
+ pid_params.sample_rate_ns = pid_params.sample_rate_ms * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
intel_pstate_reset_all_pid();
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists