[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170312052247.GA22750@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 06:22:47 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 48/91] ext4: fix inline data error paths
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 04:48:52PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 10:08 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> >
> > commit eb5efbcb762aee4b454b04f7115f73ccbcf8f0ef upstream.
> >
> > The write_end() function must always unlock the page and drop its ref
> > count, even on an error.
>
> This looks like a theoretical rather than a real issue, because I can't
> see how ext4_write_inline_data_end() ever returns an error code.
I'll leave that up to Ted to justify :)
> > Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> >
> > ---
> > fs/ext4/inline.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > fs/ext4/inode.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
> > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- a/fs/ext4/inline.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/inline.c
> > @@ -933,8 +933,15 @@ int ext4_da_write_inline_data_end(struct
> > > struct page *page)
> > {
> > int i_size_changed = 0;
> > + int ret;
> >
> > - copied = ext4_write_inline_data_end(inode, pos, len, copied, page);
> > + ret = ext4_write_inline_data_end(inode, pos, len, copied, page);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + unlock_page(page);
> > + put_page(page);
> [...]
>
> For 4.4 each put_page() should ideally be changed to
> page_cache_release(). It makes no practical difference but would be
> consistent with other paths.
As it's still the same logic, I'd prefer to stick to what newer kernels
do if at all possible.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists