[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc946709-df33-5c5b-5af6-d889f25087ce@nod.at>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 10:45:04 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] um: use KERN_CONT in stack dump
Vegard,
Am 12.03.2017 um 10:38 schrieb Vegard Nossum:
> Without KERN_CONT, the symbol will appear on a new line, making stack
> traces completely unreadable:
>
> Call Trace:
> [<6008e891>] ?
> printk+0x0/0x94
> [<6001cce6>]
> show_stack+0xfe/0x15b
> [<600666ec>] ?
> dump_stack_print_info+0xe1/0xea
> [<6008e891>] ?
> printk+0x0/0x94
> [<6023e826>] ?
> bust_spinlocks+0x0/0x4f
> [<602343b8>]
> dump_stack+0x2a/0x2c
> [<6008e662>]
> panic+0x170/0x31e
> [<6008e4f2>] ?
> panic+0x0/0x31e
>
> This makes it readable again:
>
> Call Trace:
> [<6008e891>] ? printk+0x0/0x94
> [<6001cce6>] show_stack+0xfe/0x15b
> [<600666ec>] ? dump_stack_print_info+0xe1/0xea
> [<6008e891>] ? printk+0x0/0x94
> [<6023e826>] ? bust_spinlocks+0x0/0x4f
> [<602343b8>] dump_stack+0x2a/0x2c
> [<6008e662>] panic+0x170/0x31e
>
> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
> ---
> arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
> index a76295f7ede9..edf1f80123e7 100644
> --- a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
> +++ b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static void _print_addr(void *data, unsigned long address, int reliable)
> {
> pr_info(" [<%08lx>]", address);
> pr_cont(" %s", reliable ? "" : "? ");
> - print_symbol("%s", address);
> + print_symbol(KERN_CONT "%s", address);
> pr_cont("\n");
> }
>
I think it is better to fix the root of the problem by using a single printk.
i.e.
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
index aa1b56f5ac68..18eddf677ec6 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
@@ -17,10 +17,8 @@
static void _print_addr(void *data, unsigned long address, int reliable)
{
- pr_info(" [<%08lx>]", address);
- pr_cont(" %s", reliable ? "" : "? ");
- print_symbol("%s", address);
- pr_cont("\n");
+ pr_info(" [<%08lx>] %s%pB\n", address, reliable ? "" : "? ",
+ (void *)address);
}
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists