linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: User/admin documentation update and consolidation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170313165438.13eba0a7@lwn.net>
Date:   Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:54:38 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: User/admin documentation update and
 consolidation

On Thu, 09 Mar 2017 16:28:32 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:

> The user/admin documentation of cpufreq is badly outdated.  It
> conains stale and/or inaccurate information along with things
> that are not particularly useful.  Also, some of the important
> pieces are missing from it.
> 
> For this reason, add a new user/admin document for cpufreq
> containing current information to admin-guide and drop the old
> outdated .txt documents it is replacing.

Out of curiosity, how did you generate this?  Neither "git am" nor
"patch" wants to deal with it.  Can I ask for a retry?

Thanks,

jon