[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170313234303.GA14626@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 07:43:03 +0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
okash.khawaja@...il.com, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Kirk Reiser <kirk@...sers.ca>,
Chris Brannon <chris@...-brannons.com>,
speakup@...ux-speakup.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] staging: speakup: introduce tty-based comms
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:26:08PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Greg KH, on mar. 14 mars 2017 06:14:04 +0800, wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:05:51PM +0000, okash.khawaja@...il.com wrote:
> > > This patchset introduces a TTY-based way for the synths to communicate
> > > with devices as an alternate for direct serial comms used by the synths
> > > at the moment. It then migrates some of the synths to the TTY-based
> > > comms. Synths migrated in this patchset are dummy, acntsa, bns and
> > > txprt.
> >
> > What about using the serbus code that is now in the tree?
>
> I guess you mean serdev?
Sorry, yes.
> Well, for a start that didn't exist when Okash worked on the TTY part :)
Fair enough, but it has been discussed for many months now on the
linux-serial mailing list.
> > That should make this a lot easier than your patchset from what I can
> > see.
>
> Will serdev support modem line control? We need this for some devices.
> How is the serial port chosen with serdev?
Best asked on the linux-serial mailing list :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists