linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.10 09/75] s390/dcssblk: fix device size calculation in dcssblk_direct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170313083411.917503437@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:43:18 +0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.10 09/75] s390/dcssblk: fix device size calculation in dcssblk_direct_access()

4.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>

commit a63f53e34db8b49675448d03ae324f6c5bc04fe6 upstream.

Since commit dd22f551 "block: Change direct_access calling convention",
the device size calculation in dcssblk_direct_access() is off-by-one.
This results in bdev_direct_access() always returning -ENXIO because the
returned value is not page aligned.

Fix this by adding 1 to the dev_sz calculation.

Fixes: dd22f551 ("block: Change direct_access calling convention")
Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/s390/block/dcssblk.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/s390/block/dcssblk.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/block/dcssblk.c
@@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ dcssblk_direct_access (struct block_devi
 	dev_info = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
 	if (!dev_info)
 		return -ENODEV;
-	dev_sz = dev_info->end - dev_info->start;
+	dev_sz = dev_info->end - dev_info->start + 1;
 	offset = secnum * 512;
 	*kaddr = (void *) dev_info->start + offset;
 	*pfn = __pfn_to_pfn_t(PFN_DOWN(dev_info->start + offset), PFN_DEV);