[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170313083415.583094979@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:39:00 +0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 13/63] net: mvpp2: fix DMA address calculation in mvpp2_txq_inc_put()
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
commit 239a3b663647869330955ec59caac0100ef9b60a upstream.
When TX descriptors are filled in, the buffer DMA address is split
between the tx_desc->buf_phys_addr field (high-order bits) and
tx_desc->packet_offset field (5 low-order bits).
However, when we re-calculate the DMA address from the TX descriptor in
mvpp2_txq_inc_put(), we do not take tx_desc->packet_offset into
account. This means that when the DMA address is not aligned on a 32
bytes boundary, we end up calling dma_unmap_single() with a DMA address
that was not the one returned by dma_map_single().
This inconsistency is detected by the kernel when DMA_API_DEBUG is
enabled. We fix this problem by properly calculating the DMA address in
mvpp2_txq_inc_put().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2.c
@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ static void mvpp2_txq_inc_put(struct mvp
txq_pcpu->buffs + txq_pcpu->txq_put_index;
tx_buf->skb = skb;
tx_buf->size = tx_desc->data_size;
- tx_buf->phys = tx_desc->buf_phys_addr;
+ tx_buf->phys = tx_desc->buf_phys_addr + tx_desc->packet_offset;
txq_pcpu->txq_put_index++;
if (txq_pcpu->txq_put_index == txq_pcpu->size)
txq_pcpu->txq_put_index = 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists