lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 13 Mar 2017 10:57:33 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Masanari Iida <standby24x7@...il.com>
cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [linux-next] x86/smpboot: Remove duplicate inclusion of
 asm/reammode.h

Masanari,

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Masanari Iida wrote:

> Subject : [PATCH] [linux-next] x86/smpboot: Remove duplicate inclusion of 
>          asm/reammode.h

The "linux-next" tag is pointless. The duplicate include is in Linus tree
as well, so this is not linux-next specific at all.

Please be more careful with your subject lines. reammode.h ????

> This patch remove duplicate asm/realmode.h in smpboot.c

Please read Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst. Especially the
following paragraph:

  Describe your changes in imperative mood, e.g. "make xyzzy do frotz"
  instead of "[This patch] makes xyzzy do frotz" or "[I] changed xyzzy to
  do frotz", as if you are giving orders to the codebase to change its
  behaviour

"This patch" is really pointless. We already know that this is a patch,
otherwise you wouldn't have sent it with the "[PATCH]" prefix in the
subject line.

> Confirm successfully compile after remove the line.

That's obvious, isn't it? If the include is duplicate the removal won't
break anything.

> Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida <standby24x7@...il.com>
> 
> # Please enter the commit message for your changes. Lines starting
> # with '#' will be kept; you may remove them yourself if you want to.
> # An empty message aborts the commit.
> # On branch smpboot-fix
> # Changes to be committed:
> #	modified:   arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> #

Please adjust your workflow. This is not part of a changelog. It's the
comment section of the git-commit template which should not be part of your
patch submission at all.

Thanks,

	tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ