[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+ZURf-+9CNJi-Ls8_nZrpRJWVomYi3CLa=kdUyXE0A8+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 11:04:32 +0100
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: futex: use-after-free in futex_wait_requeue_pi
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On 2017-03-13 09:06:20 [+0100], Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 07:10:30PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> > The following program triggers use-after-free in futex_wait_requeue_pi:
>> > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/dvyukov/42e596153263793b75ad587c8d0626b0/raw/35461a6c1b0a4163a67191ff5d35202f35ecbf44/gistfile1.txt
>> There's a known use-after-free there, see:
>> I've not woken up enough; or actually looked at your report to see if
>> its the same.
>
> It seems so, yes. The test-case triggered on the commit mentioned in
> less than a minute and after the patch applied it runs now for 16
> without complains.
> A stable tag would be nice then :)
Yes, looking at the fix, I would expect that it fixes the problem.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists