linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] staging: fbtft: Allows bpp to be set from dt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:16:13 +0100
From:   Radosław Pietrzyk <radoslaw.pietrzyk@...il.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: fbtft: Allows bpp to be set from dt

Ok I will. I just have thought that in general it might be helpful to
have this possibility as DT is parsed for this option anyway. If you
think it is not needed at all that why to bother parsing DT for this
option in the first place ?

2017-03-13 12:11 GMT+01:00 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:07:20PM +0100, Radosław Pietrzyk wrote:
>> I have and used with stm32 and fb_ili9341. First patch was shitty, my bad.
>>
>
> Could you resend with a patch description which says why you are doing
> this?
>
> "With stm32 and fb_ili9341 the monitor just sits there blinking because
> bpp is not set" or something.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>