[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dfc1e19f-8b83-fc1a-3653-7e95bcc3c7f0@synopsys.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 11:43:44 +0000
From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
<architt@...eaurora.org>, <mchehab@...nel.org>
CC: <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>,
<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
<sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] drm: bridge: dw-hdmi: Switch to V4L bus format and
encodings
Hi Neil,
On 09-03-2017 14:27, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
>
> On 08-03-2017 12:12, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> Hi Jose,
>>
>> It seems here that we only have the RGB444<->YUV444 8bit tables, from the Amlogic
>> source I have the following for 10bit, 12bit and 16bit for itu601 :
>>
>> static const u16 csc_coeff_rgb_out_eitu601_10b[3][4] = {
>> { 0x2000, 0x6926, 0x74fd, 0x043b },
>> { 0x2000, 0x2cdd, 0x0000, 0x7a65 },
>> { 0x2000, 0x0000, 0x38b4, 0x78ea }
>> };
>>
>> static const u16 csc_coeff_rgb_out_eitu601_12b_16b[3][4] = {
>> { 0x2000, 0x6926, 0x74fd, 0x10ee },
>> { 0x2000, 0x2cdd, 0x0000, 0x6992 },
>> { 0x2000, 0x0000, 0x38b4, 0x63a6 }
>> };
> These two do not match anything I have here.
>
>> static const u16 csc_coeff_rgb_in_eitu601_10b[3][4] = {
>> { 0x2591, 0x1322, 0x074b, 0x0000 },
>> { 0x6535, 0x2000, 0x7acc, 0x0800 },
>> { 0x6acd, 0x7534, 0x2000, 0x0800 }
>> };
> This is more or less correct, I have small offsets. Note that I
> even have offsets with the values that are in dw-hdmi driver,
> which can be caused because I'm seeing the latest document that
> contain these values. I guess they were updated.
>
>> static const u16 csc_coeff_rgb_in_eitu601_12b_16b[3][4] = {
>> { 0x2591, 0x1322, 0x074b, 0x0000 },
>> { 0x6535, 0x2000, 0x7acc, 0x2000 },
>> { 0x6acd, 0x7534, 0x2000, 0x2000 }
>> };
> The same for this.
>
>> But I miss the itu709 values.
>>
>> Could you confirm these values and maybe provide the itu709 values ?
> I will have to check if I can provide you the values. I will get
> back to you.
Sorry but looks like I won't be able to provide you the correct
values :/ If you are working for a Synopsys customer you can
contact our CAE (If so I can guide you to the correct CAE).
Anyway, unless you can test the values you have I suggest you
don't use them, they do not match what I have here and I can't
test them because right now I don't have a setup (I'm assuming
that your CSC block within the controller was not modified).
Best regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists