[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y3w9nryh.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 10:59:02 -0400
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/14] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: rework ATU Load/Purge
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> writes:
> It does result in more patches, more to review, but it is much easier
> to review, because it should be obviously correct. The overall lines
> of code at the end is the same. So overall there is no harm is having
> lots of small patches.
Your concerns are dully noted. I'll do my best to split my upcoming
changes in smaller, easier to review, patches.
Thanks!
Vivien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists