[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170313193003.GB5941@d830.WORKGROUP>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:30:04 -0700
From: Alison Schofield <amsfield22@...il.com>
To: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@...il.com>
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, jic23@...nel.org,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v3] staging: adis16060_core: Use
private driver lock instead of mlock
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:41:30PM +0530, simran singhal wrote:
> The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by
> the IIO core only for protecting device operating mode changes.
> ie. Changes between INDIO_DIRECT_MODE, INDIO_BUFFER_* modes.
>
> In this driver, mlock was being used to protect hardware state
> changes. Replace it with a lock in the devices global data.
>
> Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@...il.com>
> ---
>
> v3:
> -Removed new lock to reuse the existing lock
Hi Simran,
Check Lars review comments about refactoring into a
write_then_read function protected by same buf_lock.
As it is now, it'll deadlock on buf_lock. It locks in
_read_raw and then calls _spi_write where an attempt
is made to grab the same lock.
alisons
>
> drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c b/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c
> index c9d46e7..602ec53 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c
> @@ -83,11 +83,12 @@ static int adis16060_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> {
> u16 tval = 0;
> int ret;
> + struct adis16060_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>
> switch (mask) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> /* Take the iio_dev status lock */
> - mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->buf_lock);
> ret = adis16060_spi_write(indio_dev, chan->address);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out_unlock;
> @@ -96,7 +97,7 @@ static int adis16060_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out_unlock;
>
> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->buf_lock);
> *val = tval;
> return IIO_VAL_INT;
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET:
> @@ -112,7 +113,7 @@ static int adis16060_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> out_unlock:
> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->buf_lock);
> return ret;
> }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/20170313181130.GA27111%40singhal-Inspiron-5558.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists