[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4i1phF5rZL--g6ojguHScKetNA3gfsZRpHhVw3VbgqmFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:44:25 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: add private lock to serialize memory hotplug operations
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Heiko Carstens
<heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 11:34:44PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > The memory described by devm_memremap_pages() is never "onlined" to
>> > the core mm. We're only using arch_add_memory() to get a linear
>> > mapping and page structures. The rest of memory hotplug is skipped,
>> > and this ZONE_DEVICE memory is otherwise hidden from the core mm.
>>
>> OK, that should be fine then.
>
> So, does that mean that the patch is ok as it is? If so, it would be good
> to get an Ack from both, you and Dan, please.
Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists