[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170313205130.2b5c5272@tock>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:51:30 +0100
From: Alban <albeu@...e.fr>
To: Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>
Cc: Aban Bedel <albeu@...e.fr>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/19] gpio: ath79: make use of raw_spinlock variants
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 10:21:53 -0600
Julia Cartwright <julia@...com> wrote:
> The ath79 gpio driver currently implements an irq_chip for handling
> interrupts; due to how irq_chip handling is done, it's necessary for the
> irq_chip methods to be invoked from hardirq context, even on a a
> real-time kernel. Because the spinlock_t type becomes a "sleeping"
> spinlock w/ RT kernels, it is not suitable to be used with irq_chips.
>
> A quick audit of the operations under the lock reveal that they do only
> minimal, bounded work, and are therefore safe to do under a raw spinlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>
Acked-by: Aban Bedel <albeu@...e.fr>
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists