lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1489534821.2733.47.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:40:21 -0700
From:   Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -v6 4/9] mm, THP, swap: Add get_huge_swap_page()

On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 15:26 +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
> 
> A variation of get_swap_page(), get_huge_swap_page(), is added to
> allocate a swap cluster (HPAGE_PMD_NR swap slots) based on the swap
> cluster allocation function.  A fair simple algorithm is used, that is,
> only the first swap device in priority list will be tried to allocate
> the swap cluster.  The function will fail if the trying is not
> successful, and the caller will fallback to allocate a single swap slot
> instead.  This works good enough for normal cases.
> 
> This will be used for the THP (Transparent Huge Page) swap support.
> Where get_huge_swap_page() will be used to allocate one swap cluster for
> each THP swapped out.
> 
> Because of the algorithm adopted, if the difference of the number of the
> free swap clusters among multiple swap devices is significant, it is
> possible that some THPs are split earlier than necessary.  For example,
> this could be caused by big size difference among multiple swap devices.
> 
> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/swap.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  mm/swap_slots.c      |  5 +++--
>  mm/swapfile.c        | 16 ++++++++++++----
>  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> index 278e1349a424..e3a7609a8989 100644
> --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static inline long get_nr_swap_pages(void)
>  extern void si_swapinfo(struct sysinfo *);
>  extern swp_entry_t get_swap_page(void);
>  extern swp_entry_t get_swap_page_of_type(int);
> -extern int get_swap_pages(int n, swp_entry_t swp_entries[]);
> +extern int get_swap_pages(int n, swp_entry_t swp_entries[], bool huge);
>  extern int add_swap_count_continuation(swp_entry_t, gfp_t);
>  extern void swap_shmem_alloc(swp_entry_t);
>  extern int swap_duplicate(swp_entry_t);
> @@ -527,6 +527,23 @@ static inline swp_entry_t get_swap_page(void)
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SWAP */
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_THP_SWAP_CLUSTER
> +static inline swp_entry_t get_huge_swap_page(void)
> +{
> +	swp_entry_t entry;
> +
> +	if (get_swap_pages(1, &entry, true))
> +		return entry;
> +	else
> +		return (swp_entry_t) {0};
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline swp_entry_t get_huge_swap_page(void)
> +{
> +	return (swp_entry_t) {0};
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
>  static inline int mem_cgroup_swappiness(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  {
> diff --git a/mm/swap_slots.c b/mm/swap_slots.c
> index 9b5bc86f96ad..075bb39e03c5 100644
> --- a/mm/swap_slots.c
> +++ b/mm/swap_slots.c
> @@ -258,7 +258,8 @@ static int refill_swap_slots_cache(struct swap_slots_cache *cache)
>  
>  	cache->cur = 0;
>  	if (swap_slot_cache_active)
> -		cache->nr = get_swap_pages(SWAP_SLOTS_CACHE_SIZE, cache->slots);
> +		cache->nr = get_swap_pages(SWAP_SLOTS_CACHE_SIZE, cache->slots,
> +					   false);
>  
>  	return cache->nr;
>  }
> @@ -334,7 +335,7 @@ swp_entry_t get_swap_page(void)
>  			return entry;
>  	}
>  
> -	get_swap_pages(1, &entry);
> +	get_swap_pages(1, &entry, false);
>  
>  	return entry;
>  }
> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> index 91876c33114b..7241c937e52b 100644
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -904,11 +904,12 @@ static unsigned long scan_swap_map(struct swap_info_struct *si,
>  
>  }
>  
> -int get_swap_pages(int n_goal, swp_entry_t swp_entries[])


> +int get_swap_pages(int n_goal, swp_entry_t swp_entries[], bool huge)
>  {
>  	struct swap_info_struct *si, *next;
>  	long avail_pgs;
>  	int n_ret = 0;
> +	int nr_pages = huge_cluster_nr_entries(huge);
>  
>  	avail_pgs = atomic_long_read(&nr_swap_pages);
>  	if (avail_pgs <= 0)
> @@ -920,6 +921,10 @@ int get_swap_pages(int n_goal, swp_entry_t swp_entries[])
>  	if (n_goal > avail_pgs)
>  		n_goal = avail_pgs;
>  
> +	n_goal *= nr_pages;

I think if (n_goal > 1) when huge is true, 
n_goal should be set to huge_cluster_nr_entries(huge) here
or we could have an invalid check below. We probably
should add a comment to get_swap_pages on how we treat
n_goal when huge is true.  Maybe say we will always treat
n_goal as SWAPFILE_CLUSTER when huge is true. 

> +	if (avail_pgs < n_goal)
> +		goto noswap;
> +
>  	atomic_long_sub(n_goal, &nr_swap_pages);
>  
>  	spin_lock(&swap_avail_lock);
> @@ -946,10 +951,13 @@ int get_swap_pages(int n_goal, swp_entry_t swp_entries[])
>  			spin_unlock(&si->lock);
>  			goto nextsi;
>  		}
> -		n_ret = scan_swap_map_slots(si, SWAP_HAS_CACHE,
> -					    n_goal, swp_entries);
> +		if (likely(nr_pages == 1))

if (likely(!huge)) is probably more readable

> +			n_ret = scan_swap_map_slots(si, SWAP_HAS_CACHE,
> +						    n_goal, swp_entries);
> +		else
> +			n_ret = swap_alloc_huge_cluster(si, swp_entries);
>  		spin_unlock(&si->lock);

Thanks.

Tim

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ