lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <281def1c-e0dc-1493-3f48-fc0024c534ac@6wind.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:25:03 +0100
From:   Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, bp@...en8.de,
        slash.tmp@...e.fr, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, msalter@...hat.com, jengelh@...i.de,
        hch@...radead.org, Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>,
        mpe@...erman.id.au, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, ldv@...linux.org,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/11] uapi: export all headers under uapi directories

Le 14/03/2017 à 06:38, Masahiro Yamada a écrit :
> Ni Nicolas,
> 
> 
> 2017-03-14 1:57 GMT+09:00 Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>:
>>> BTW, this series does not apply cleanly.
>>>
>>> If you could rebase it onto v4.11-rc1 tag,
>>> it would be helpful.
>> You really want this on top of 4.11-rc1 or the last linus tag, ie v4.11-rc2?
>>
> 
> Basically, I queue up patches based on -rc1 tag
> unless there is a particular reason for otherwise.
Ok, thank you for the explanation.

> 
> If it is based on -rc1, will it cause conflicts with Linus tree?
I will check and let you know in the v10 submission.


Thank you,
Nicolas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ