[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170314083804.1756-1-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:38:04 +0100
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...rochip.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
"# v4 . 1+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: at91: pm: cpu_idle: switch DDR to power-down mode
On some DDR controllers, compatible with the sama5d3 one,
the sequence to enter/exit/re-enter the self-refresh mode adds
more constrains than what is currently written in the at91_idle
driver. An actual access to the DDR chip is needed between exit
and re-enter of this mode which is somehow difficult to implement.
This sequence can completely hang the SoC. It is particularly
experienced on parts which embed a L2 cache if the code run
between IDLE calls fits in it...
Moreover, as the intention is to enter and exit pretty rapidly
from IDLE, the power-down mode is a good candidate.
So now we use power-down instead of self-refresh. As we can
simplify the code for sama5d3 compatible DDR controllers,
we instantiate a new sama5d3_ddr_standby() function.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v4.1+
Fixes: 017b5522d5e3 ("ARM: at91: Add new binding for sama5d3-ddramc")
---
arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
index 3d89b7905bd9..a277981f414d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
@@ -289,6 +289,22 @@ static void at91_ddr_standby(void)
at91_ramc_write(1, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, saved_lpr1);
}
+static void sama5d3_ddr_standby(void)
+{
+ u32 lpr0;
+ u32 saved_lpr0;
+
+ saved_lpr0 = at91_ramc_read(0, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR);
+ lpr0 = saved_lpr0 & ~AT91_DDRSDRC_LPCB;
+ lpr0 |= AT91_DDRSDRC_LPCB_POWER_DOWN;
+
+ at91_ramc_write(0, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, lpr0);
+
+ cpu_do_idle();
+
+ at91_ramc_write(0, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, saved_lpr0);
+}
+
/* We manage both DDRAM/SDRAM controllers, we need more than one value to
* remember.
*/
@@ -323,7 +339,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id const ramc_ids[] __initconst = {
{ .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-sdramc", .data = at91rm9200_standby },
{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-sdramc", .data = at91sam9_sdram_standby },
{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-ddramc", .data = at91_ddr_standby },
- { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-ddramc", .data = at91_ddr_standby },
+ { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-ddramc", .data = sama5d3_ddr_standby },
{ /*sentinel*/ }
};
--
2.9.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists