[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c026a6e-7411-64ac-a5a8-dbbee103f594@windriver.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:16:21 +0800
From: qhou <qi.hou@...driver.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: <mingo@...hat.com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
<paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>, <bruce.ashfield@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: call time_hardirqs_off after clearing
hardirqs_enabled
Hi, all
Sorry for everybody concerned. Please ignore this patch.
I sent this patch without my supervisor's ACKed. I missed a lot of
important information.
I'm a newbie for submitting patches to community and I should have sent
a valid patch under
my supervisor's guidance.
Execuse me, everyone.
Qi Hou
On 2017年03月14日 16:44, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Qi Hou wrote:
>
>> The current order of calls within trace_hardirqs_off_caller() would provoke
>> an "unannotated irqs-off" WARNING.
> Can you finally provide information how you trigger this warning?
>
> - Kernel version
> - .config file
> - test case or instructions how to provoke it?
>
> instead of sending guess work patches and wasting everybodys time.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
--
Best regards,
Qi Hou
Phone number: +86-10-8477-8608
Address: Floor 15, Building B, Wangjing Plaza, No.9 Zhong-Huan Nanlu, Chaoyang District
Powered by blists - more mailing lists