linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lockdep: call time_hardirqs_off after clearing hardirqs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:16:21 +0800
From:   qhou <qi.hou@...driver.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:     <mingo@...hat.com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
        <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>, <bruce.ashfield@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: call time_hardirqs_off after clearing
 hardirqs_enabled

Hi, all

Sorry for everybody concerned. Please ignore this patch.

I sent this patch without my supervisor's ACKed. I missed a lot of 
important information.

I'm a newbie for submitting patches to community and I should have sent 
a valid patch under

my supervisor's guidance.

Execuse me, everyone.

Qi Hou



On 2017年03月14日 16:44, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Qi Hou wrote:
>
>> The current order of calls within trace_hardirqs_off_caller() would provoke
>> an "unannotated irqs-off" WARNING.
> Can you finally provide information how you trigger this warning?
>
>      - Kernel version
>      - .config file
>      - test case or instructions how to provoke it?
>
> instead of sending guess work patches and wasting everybodys time.
>
> Thanks,
>
> 	tglx

-- 
Best regards,
Qi Hou
Phone number: +86-10-8477-8608
Address: Floor 15, Building B, Wangjing Plaza, No.9 Zhong-Huan Nanlu, Chaoyang District