lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:32:46 +0200
From:   Alexander Kapshuk <alexander.kapshuk@...il.com>
To:     Pushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar.iit@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ivan Safonov <insafonov@...il.com>,
        Yamanappagouda Patil <goudapatilk@...il.com>,
        William Blough <devel@...ugh.us>,
        Georgiana Rodica Chelu <georgiana.chelu93@...il.com>,
        Kyle Kuffermann <kyle.kuffermann@...il.com>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtl8188eu: Correcting macro ROUND macro defination

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Pushkar Jambhlekar
<pushkar.iit@...il.com> wrote:
> Description:
>     There should not be ';' after do ... while(0) in macro defination
>
> Signed-off-by: Pushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar.iit@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c
> index b283a490..5b1ef22 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c
> @@ -1690,4 +1690,4 @@ do {                                                                      \
>         d##1 = TE0(s##1) ^ TE1(s##2) ^ TE2(s##3) ^ TE3(s##0) ^ rk[4 * i + 1]; \
>         d##2 = TE0(s##2) ^ TE1(s##3) ^ TE2(s##0) ^ TE3(s##1) ^ rk[4 * i + 2]; \
>         d##3 = TE0(s##3) ^ TE1(s##0) ^ TE2(s##1) ^ TE3(s##2) ^ rk[4 * i + 3]; \
> -} while (0);
> +} while (0)
> --
> 2.7.4
>

A semicolon is required after 'while(bool);' in 'do..while'.
Without it, you get a compile time error.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ