[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPeCK1cjY78+PfcTprTnyXJ1k9zcUj8nW7onG8y0TWGzzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 15:04:28 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] ARM: dts: s3c64xx: Enable watchdog on all S3C64xx boards
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<b.zolnierkie@...sung.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday, March 11, 2017 07:25:23 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Watchdog module does not have external dependencies so it can be safely
>> enabled in s3c64xx.dtsi thus making it available for all S3C64xx-based
>> boards.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>
> Please first fix the driver w.r.t. infinite interrupt in soft mode
> issue and only then enable it on more hardware. IOW this patch
> should be placed after patch #7 in the series.
The soft-interrupt mode is not the default one so this should not
cause any issues by default but I got your point. Makes sense. The
pity is the timing. There wasn't much interest in the patchset (no
comments since 24 of Feb) so I merged it yesterday evening. Does it
brake any platform/board?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists