[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170314145527.q53qh7yzm2x4zksf@t450s.lan>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 15:55:27 +0100
From: Gary Bisson <gary.bisson@...ndarydevices.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>,
ext Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix pinctrl setup for i.IMX6
Hi Linus,
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 03:47:58PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Mika Penttilä
> <mika.penttila@...tfour.com> wrote:
>
> > Recent pulls for mainline pre 4.11 introduced pinctrl setup changes and moved pinctrl-imx to
> > use generic helpers.
> >
> > Net effect was that hog group could not be resolved. I made it work for myself
> > with a two stage setup with create and start separated, and dt probe in between them.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>
>
> Sorry for including the whole mail body, some people may have missed the
> mail. Notably the i.MX maintainers.
>
> Your patch reminds me of the pinctrl_register() vs pinctrl_register_and_init()
> introduced by Tony Lindgren, can you look into this in commit
> 950b0d91dc108f54bccca5a2f75bb46f2df63d29
> "pinctrl: core: Fix regression caused by delayed work for hogs"?
>
> Does switching pinctrl_register_and_init() back to pinctrl_register()
> solve your problem?
>
> Gary: have you seen any problem like this?
Yes, Mika brought it up as soon as the first 4.11-rc appeared and indeed
this issue can be reproduced on any i.MX6 platform.
Then Tony offered a patch but you haven't replied to him yet:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/28/140
Regards,
Gary
Powered by blists - more mailing lists