linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v0 1/2] interconnect: Add generic interconnect controller API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:35:57 +0200
From:   Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, khilman@...libre.com,
        mturquette@...libre.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        skannan@...eaurora.org, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
        andy.gross@...aro.org, seansw@....qualcomm.com,
        davidai@...cinc.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v0 1/2] interconnect: Add generic interconnect controller
 API

On 03/03/2017 12:53 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/01/17 10:22, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/Kconfig b/drivers/interconnect/Kconfig
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..103524b59905
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/Kconfig
>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>> +menuconfig INTERCONNECT
>> +	bool "On-Chip Interconnect management support"
>
> Why isn't this symbol tristate instead of bool so that the
> interconnect management support can be built as a loadable module?
>

Thanks for the comment! For simplicity, the core API currently is
only supported as a built-in, but we can definitely try making it
modular. I can do it after we get some initial feedback on if and
how this concept fits in the kernel and set the direction we want
to go.

BR,
Georgi

>
>> +	help
>> +	  Support for management of the on-chip interconnects.
>> +
>> +	  This framework is designed to provide a generic interface for
>> +          managing the interconnects in a SoC.
>> +
>> +	  If unsure, say no.
>> +
>
>