[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07e0e4b2-36a5-a37e-ea04-d05158d11fba@savoirfairelinux.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:40:08 -0400
From: Sebastien Bourdelin <sebastien.bourdelin@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel <kernel@...oirfairelinux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Mark Featherston <mark@...eddedarm.com>, kris@...eddedarm.com,
Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
damien.riegel@...oirfairelinux.com,
Lucile Quirion <lucile.quirion@...oirfairelinux.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] bus: add driver for the Technologic Systems NBUS
Hi Linus,
On 03/14/2017 09:23 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Sebastien Bourdelin
> <sebastien.bourdelin@...oirfairelinux.com> wrote:
>> On 02/04/2017 05:14 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>>>> + gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep(gpios->ndescs, gpios->desc, values);
>>>
>>> This can also fail and you should check the return code and print an error
>>> message if it does.
>>>
>> As far as i understood, the "gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep(...)"
>> function doesn't return
>> anything, it will return immediately if gpios->desc is null but nothing
>> else.
>> Did i miss something?
>
> No I did, sorry about that.
>
> We *should* make these functions return errors but currently they do not.
>
Ok got it.
Thanks!
>>> Error codes?
>>>
>> Same question here, these functions only make call to
>> "gpiod_set_value_cansleep(...)",
>> which as far as i understood doesn't return any error code.
>
> Yeah, forget that.
>
Ok.
>>>> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ts_nbus->csn, 1);
>>>
>>> Here too.
>>>
>> Same question, doesn't seem to have an error code.
>
> That too.
>
Ok.
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
Best regards,
Sebastien Bourdelin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists