lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:10:12 -0500
From:   "Li, Yi" <yi1.li@...ux.intel.com>
To:     matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     ming.lei@...onical.com, mcgrof@...nel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, atull@...nsource.altera.com,
        moritz.fischer@...us.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] firmware class: Add stream_firmware API.

hi Matthew,


On 3/13/2017 4:09 PM, matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Li, Yi wrote:
>
>> Hi Matthew
>>
> Hi Yi,
>
>
>>
>> On 3/10/2017 11:44 AM, matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, yi1.li@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Yi Li <yi1.li@...ux.intel.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Yi,
>>>
>>> Just one question below.
>>>
>>> Matthew Gerlach
>>>
>>>
>>>> Add function to load firmware in multiple chucks instead of
>>>>
>>>> loading the whole big firmware file at once.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yi Li <yi1.li@...ux.intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/base/firmware_class.c | 128 
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> include/linux/firmware.h      |   2 +
>>>> 2 files changed, 130 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c 
>>>> b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
>>>> index ac350c5..44fddff 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
>>>> @@ -436,6 +436,62 @@ fw_get_filesystem_firmware(struct device 
>>>> *device, struct firmware_buf *buf)
>>>>     return rc;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static int
>>>> +fw_stream_filesystem_firmware(struct device *device, struct 
>>>> firmware_buf *buf,
>>>> +            size_t offset, size_t length)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    int i, len;
>>>> +    char *path;
>>>> +    int rc = 0;
>>>> +    struct file *file;
>>>> +
>>>> +    buf->size = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +    path = __getname();
>>>> +    if (!path)
>>>> +        return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +
>>>> +    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(fw_path); i++) {
>>>> +        /* skip the unset customized path */
>>>> +        if (!fw_path[i][0])
>>>> +            continue;
>>>> +
>>>> +        len = snprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s",
>>>> +                   fw_path[i], buf->fw_id);
>>>
>>> I'm probably being paranoid, but is it safe to assume the length of 
>>> the buffer returned by __getname() is at least PATH_MAX?  It seems like
>>> the length should be pagesize.
>>
>> The size should be the maximum number of char of the string be 
>> produced, not the input size.
>> According to 
>> https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Formatted-Output-Functions.html
>> Function:/int/*snprintf*/(char *s, size_tsize, const char *template, …)
>> /The|snprintf|function is similar to|sprintf|, except that 
>> thesizeargument specifies the maximum number of characters to 
>> produce. The trailing null character is counted towards this limit, 
>> so you should allocate at leastsizecharacters for the strings. 
>> Ifsizeis zero, nothing, not even the null byte, shall be written 
>> andsmay be a null pointer.
>> The return value is the number of characters which would be generated 
>> for the given input, excluding the trailing null. If this value is 
>> greater than or equal tosize, not all characters from the result have 
>> been stored ins
>>
>
> I am familiar with the functionality of snprintf versus sprintf. In the
> snprintf call above, you are saying that memory pointed to by the 
> variable path, has at least PATH_MAX number of bytes.  My question is 
> how can you know that the memory returned by __getname() has PATH_MAX 
> number of bytes?
>
>

Ah, now I understand the concerns.

The __getname() will allocate an buffer object from names_cachep
extern struct kmem_cache 
<http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=kmem_cache> *names_cachep 
<http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=names_cachep>;
#define __getname <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=__getname>() 
kmem_cache_alloc 
<http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=kmem_cache_alloc>(names_cachep 
<http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=names_cachep>, GFP_KERNEL 
<http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=GFP_KERNEL>)

names_cachep is created in fs/dcaches.c vfs_caches_init function with 
object size equal to PATH_MAX.
names_cachep <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=names_cachep> = 
kmem_cache_create 
<http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=kmem_cache_create>(/"names_cache"/, 
PATH_MAX <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=PATH_MAX>, 
0,SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN 
<http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN>|SLAB_PANIC 
<http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=SLAB_PANIC>, NULL 
<http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=NULL>);

so __getname() should allocate buffer with size of PATH_MAX.

The code is borrowed from fw_get_filesystem_firmware function, which 
should be reviewed and safe to use. :)

Thanks,
Yi


>>>
>>>> +        if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
>>>> +            rc = -ENAMETOOLONG;
>>>> +            break;
>>>> +        }
>>>> +
>>>> +        if (!path || !*path)
>>>> +            continue;
>>>> +
>>>> +        if (!buf->data) {
>>>> +            buf->data = vmalloc(length);
>>>> +            if (!buf->data) {
>>>> +                rc = -ENOMEM;
>>>> +                break;
>>>> +            }
>>>> +        }
>>>> +
>>>> +        file = filp_open(path, O_RDONLY, 0);
>>>> +        if (IS_ERR(file))
>>>> +            continue;
>>>> +
>>>> +        buf->size = kernel_read(file, offset, (char *) buf->data,
>>>> +                    length);
>>>> +        fput(file);
>>>> +        break;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +
>>>> +    __putname(path);
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (rc)
>>>> +        dev_err(device, "loading %s failed with error %d\n",
>>>> +             path, rc);
>>>> +    return rc;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> /* firmware holds the ownership of pages */
>>>> static void firmware_free_data(const struct firmware *fw)
>>>> {
>>>> @@ -1267,6 +1323,78 @@ request_firmware(const struct firmware 
>>>> **firmware_p, const char *name,
>>>> }
>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(request_firmware);
>>>>
>>>> +static int
>>>> +_stream_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char 
>>>> *name,
>>>> +          struct device *device, void *buf, size_t size,
>>>> +          unsigned int opt_flags, size_t offset, size_t length)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    int ret;
>>>> +    struct firmware *fw = NULL;
>>>> +    struct firmware_buf *fbuf;
>>>> +
>>>> +    if ((!firmware_p) || (!name || name[0] == '\0')) {
>>>> +        dev_err(device, "invalid firmware pointer or file name\n");
>>>> +        return -EINVAL;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (!*firmware_p) {
>>>> +        ret = _request_firmware_prepare(&fw, name, device, buf, 
>>>> size);
>>>> +        if (ret <= 0) {
>>>> +            dev_err(device, "%s: _request_firmware_prepare failed 
>>>> %d\n",
>>>> +                __func__, ret);
>>>> +        }
>>>> +    } else {
>>>> +        fw = (struct firmware *) *firmware_p;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +
>>>> +    fbuf = (struct firmware_buf *) fw->priv;
>>>> +    ret = fw_stream_filesystem_firmware(device, fbuf, offset, 
>>>> length);
>>>> +    fw->size = fbuf->size;
>>>> +    fw->data = fbuf->data;
>>>> +    *firmware_p = fw;
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (ret)
>>>> +        dev_err(device, "streaming with error %d\n", ret);
>>>> +    return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * stream_firmware: - send firmware request and wait for it
>>>> + * @firmware_p: pointer to firmware image
>>>> + * @name: name of firmware file
>>>> + * @device: device for which firmware is being loaded
>>>> + * @offset: offset of the file to read from
>>>> + * @length: length in bytes to read
>>>> + *
>>>> + *      @firmware_p will be used to return a firmware image by the 
>>>> name
>>>> + *      of @name for device @device.
>>>> + *
>>>> + *      Should be called from user context where sleeping is allowed.
>>>> + *
>>>> + *      @name will be used as $FIRMWARE in the uevent environment and
>>>> + *      should be distinctive enough not to be confused with any 
>>>> other
>>>> + *      firmware image for this or any other device.
>>>> + *
>>>> + *    Caller must hold the reference count of @device.
>>>> + *
>>>> + *    The function can be called safely inside device's suspend and
>>>> + *    resume callback.
>>>> + **/
>>>> +int
>>>> +stream_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
>>>> +         struct device *device, size_t offset, size_t length)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    size_t ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +    /* Need to pin this module until return */
>>>> +    __module_get(THIS_MODULE);
>>>> +    ret = _stream_firmware(firmware_p, name, device, NULL, 0,
>>>> +                FW_OPT_UEVENT | FW_OPT_NO_WARN, offset, length);
>>>> +    module_put(THIS_MODULE);
>>>> +    return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(stream_firmware);
>>>> +
>>>> /**
>>>>  * request_firmware_direct: - load firmware directly without 
>>>> usermode helper
>>>>  * @firmware_p: pointer to firmware image
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/firmware.h b/include/linux/firmware.h
>>>> index b1f9f0c..accd7f6 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/firmware.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/firmware.h
>>>> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ struct builtin_fw {
>>>> #if defined(CONFIG_FW_LOADER) || (defined(CONFIG_FW_LOADER_MODULE) 
>>>> && defined(MODULE))
>>>> int request_firmware(const struct firmware **fw, const char *name,
>>>>              struct device *device);
>>>> +int stream_firmware(const struct firmware **fw, const char *name,
>>>> +            struct device *device, size_t offset, size_t length);
>>>> int request_firmware_nowait(
>>>>     struct module *module, bool uevent,
>>>>     const char *name, struct device *device, gfp_t gfp, void *context,
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.7.4
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
>>>> linux-fpga" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fpga" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ