linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/91] 4.4.53-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m2r31zair4.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2017 10:08:31 -0700
From:   Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To:     Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:     "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        shuahkh@....samsung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com,
        quentin.schulz@...e-electrons.com,
        Grégory Clement 
        <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/91] 4.4.53-stable review

Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:27:57 -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>
>> This board seems to never have successfully booted for
>> stable/linux-4.4.y:
>> https://kernelci.org/boot/id/58c2a47559b51483e7645541/
>
> It does:
>
>   https://kernelci.org/boot/id/58b457dc59b514bc145e8e4c/

Right, what I meant was that board with that defconfig has never booted.

> The problem is not 4.4, but the CONFIG_SMP=n. It also fails with other
> kernel versions, and is a bug we need to investigate.
>
> See https://kernelci.org/boot/id/58c2952159b514785a645536/, which is
> the same failure, but on 4.9, also due to CONFIG_SMP=n.
>
> I guess it's yet another I/O coherency issue, I'll try to have a look.

Thanks for looking into it,

Kevin