linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] MIPS: BPF: JIT fixes and improvements.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:34:02 -0700
From:   David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, david.daney@...ium.com,
        ralf@...ux-mips.org
Cc:     linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, james.hogan@...tec.com, ast@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        steven.hill@...ium.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] MIPS: BPF: JIT fixes and improvements.

On 03/14/2017 05:29 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:21:39 -0700
>
>> Changes from v1:
>>
>>   - Use unsigned access for SKF_AD_HATYPE
>>
>>   - Added three more patches for other problems found.
>>
>>
>> Testing the BPF JIT on Cavium OCTEON (mips64) with the test-bpf module
>> identified some failures and unimplemented features.
>>
>> With this patch set we get:
>>
>>      test_bpf: Summary: 305 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [85/297 JIT'ed]
>>
>> Both big and little endian tested.
>>
>> We still lack eBPF support, but this is better than nothing.
>
> What tree are you targetting with these changes?  Do you expect
> them to go via the MIPS or the net-next tree?
>
> Please be explicit about this in the future.
>

Sorry I didn't mention it.

My expectation is that Ralf would merge it via the MIPS tree, as it is 
fully contained within arch/mips/*


David Daney

> Thank you.
>