| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:52:26 +0100
From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: Filip Štědronský <r.lklm@...narg.cz>
Cc: Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] fanotify: new event FAN_MODIFY_DIR
[CC += linux-api@...r.kernel.org]
Filip,
Since this is a kernel-user-space API change, please CC linux-api@
(and on future iterations of this patch). The kernel source file
Documentation/SubmitChecklist notes that all Linux kernel patches that
change userspace interfaces should be CCed to
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, so that the various parties who are
interested in API changes are informed. For further information, see
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/linux-api-ml.html
Thanks,
Michael
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:02 AM, Filip Štědronský <r.lklm@...narg.cz> wrote:
> Fanotify currently does not report directory modification events
> (rename, unlink, etc.). But these events are essential for about half of
> concievable fanotify use cases, especially:
>
> - file system indexers / desktop search tools
> - file synchronization tools (like Dropbox, Nextcloud, etc.),
> online backup tools
>
> and pretty much any app that needs to maintain and up-to-date internal
> representation of current contents of the file system.
>
> All applications of the above classes that I'm aware of currently use
> recursive inotify watches, which do not scale (my home dir has ~200k
> directories, creating all the watches takes ~2min and eats several tens
> of MB of kernel memory).
>
> There have been many calls for such a feature, pretty much since the
> creation of fanotify in 2009:
> * By GNOME developers:
> https://wiki.gnome.org/BastienNocera/KernelWishlist#VFS.2C_filesystems
> * By KDE developers:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201211011352.42476.Martin%40lichtvoll.de
> 'Better support for (desktop) file search / indexing applications'
> * And others:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/AANLkTi=owK=WZW4oNtpm5WpAZhqCQUdTR2K5gzJ_MqZ+%40mail.gmail.com
> 'Fanotify mv/rename?'
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1238158043.23703.20.camel%40fatty
> 'Issues with using fanotify for a filesystem indexer'
>
> Add a new fanotify event, FAN_MODIFY_DIR, that is emitted whenever the
> contents of a directory change (a directory entry is added, removed or
> renamed). This covers all the currently missing events: rename, unlink,
> mknod, mkdir, rmdir, etc.
>
> Included with the event is a file descriptor to the modified directory
> but no further info. The userspace application is expected to rescan the
> whole directory and update its model accordingly. This needs to be done
> carefully to prevent race conditions. A cross-directory rename generates
> two FAN_MODIFY_DIR events.
>
> This minimalistic approach has several advantages:
> * Does not require changes to the fanotify userspace API or the
> fsnotify in-kernel framework, apart from adding a new event.
> Especially doesn't complicate it by adding string fields.
> * Has simple and clear semantics, even with multiple renames occurring
> in parallel etc. In case of any inconsistencies, one can simply wait
> for a while and rescan again.
> * FAN_MODIFY_DIR events are easily merged in case of multiple
> operations on a directory (e.g. deleting all files).
>
> Signed-off-by: Filip Štědronský <r.lkml@...narg.cz>
>
> ---
>
> An alternative might be to create wrapper functions like
> vfs_path_(rename|unlink|...). They could also take care of calling
> security_path_(rename|unlink|...), which is currently also up to
> the indvidual callers (possibly with a flag because it might not
> be always desired).
>
> An alternative was proposed by Amir Goldstein in several long series of
> patches that add superblock-scoped (as opposed to vfsmount-scoped)
> fanotify watches and specific dentry manipulation events with filenames:
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1481984434-13293-1-git-send-email-amir73il%40gmail.com
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1482247207-4424-1-git-send-email-amir73il%40gmail.com
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1476126784-12520-1-git-send-email-amir73il%40gmail.com
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1489411223-12081-1-git-send-email-amir73il%40gmail.com
>
> There is large but not complete overlap between that proposal and
> mine (which is was originally created over a year ago, before Amir's
> work, but never posted).
>
> I think the superblock watch idea is very interesting because it might
> in the future allow reporing fsnotify events from remote and virtual
> filesystems. So I'm posting this more as a potential source of more
> ideas for discussion, or a fallback proposal in case Amir's patches
> don't make it.
> ---
> fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 1 +
> include/linux/fsnotify.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h | 5 ++++-
> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> index bbc175d4213d..5178b06c338c 100644
> --- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> +++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ static int fanotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(FAN_ACCESS != FS_ACCESS);
> BUILD_BUG_ON(FAN_MODIFY != FS_MODIFY);
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(FAN_MODIFY_DIR != FS_MODIFY_DIR);
> BUILD_BUG_ON(FAN_CLOSE_NOWRITE != FS_CLOSE_NOWRITE);
> BUILD_BUG_ON(FAN_CLOSE_WRITE != FS_CLOSE_WRITE);
> BUILD_BUG_ON(FAN_OPEN != FS_OPEN);
> diff --git a/include/linux/fsnotify.h b/include/linux/fsnotify.h
> index b43d3f5bd9ea..00fb87c975d6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fsnotify.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fsnotify.h
> @@ -208,6 +208,23 @@ static inline void fsnotify_modify(struct file *file)
> }
>
> /*
> + * fsnotify_modifydir - directory contents were changed
> + * (as a result of rename, creat, unlink, etc.)
> + */
> +static inline void fsnotify_modify_dir(struct path *path)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode = path->dentry->d_inode;
> + __u32 mask = FS_MODIFY_DIR;
> +
> + if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
> + mask |= FS_ISDIR;
> + else
> + return;
> +
> + fsnotify(inode, mask, path, FSNOTIFY_EVENT_PATH, NULL, 0);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> * fsnotify_open - file was opened
> */
> static inline void fsnotify_open(struct file *file)
> diff --git a/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h b/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
> index 487246546ebe..7751b337ec31 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>
> #define FS_OPEN_PERM 0x00010000 /* open event in an permission hook */
> #define FS_ACCESS_PERM 0x00020000 /* access event in a permissions hook */
> +#define FS_MODIFY_DIR 0x00040000 /* directory changed (rename/unlink/...) */
>
> #define FS_EXCL_UNLINK 0x04000000 /* do not send events if object is unlinked */
> #define FS_ISDIR 0x40000000 /* event occurred against dir */
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h b/include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h
> index 030508d195d3..f14e048d492a 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
> #define FAN_OPEN_PERM 0x00010000 /* File open in perm check */
> #define FAN_ACCESS_PERM 0x00020000 /* File accessed in perm check */
>
> +#define FAN_MODIFY_DIR 0x00040000 /* directory changed (rename/unlink/...) */
> +
> #define FAN_ONDIR 0x40000000 /* event occurred against dir */
>
> #define FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD 0x08000000 /* interested in child events */
> @@ -67,7 +69,8 @@
> #define FAN_ALL_EVENTS (FAN_ACCESS |\
> FAN_MODIFY |\
> FAN_CLOSE |\
> - FAN_OPEN)
> + FAN_OPEN |\
> + FAN_MODIFY_DIR)
>
> /*
> * All events which require a permission response from userspace
> --
> 2.11.1
>
--
Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer;
http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Author of "The Linux Programming Interface", http://blog.man7.org/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists