lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2017 02:11:48 -0700
From:   "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC:     Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>,
        "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@...llahan.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
        <user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        "open list:USER-MODE LINUX (UML)" 
        <user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        Linux.FS.Devel@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 6/7] x86/arch_prctl: Add ARCH_[GET|SET]_CPUID

<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
From: hpa@...or.com
Message-ID: <E47D06A9-AFDA-4A9D-8539-9CC5AB19B395@...or.com>

On March 14, 2017 12:23:40 PM PDT, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:01 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>> and at least theoretically we
>> could be indirecting though the ->stack pointer for every one if gcc
>> can't tell it won't have changed (we really need to get thread_info
>> moved into the task_struct allocation and away from the kernel stack,
>> especially since on x86 the pointer is the same size as the vestigial
>> structure it points to.)
>
>Solved by use of time machine:
>
>commit 15f4eae70d365bba26854c90b6002aaabb18c8aa
>Author: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
>Date:   Tue Sep 13 14:29:25 2016 -0700
>
>    x86: Move thread_info into task_struct
>
>
>:)

My apologies, -ESTALEBRAINCACHE...
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists