[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaCo2xOhfrEKzn8jrWRzQ=Qu0Y4Ntq1yvddSf_ndOjKeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:57:49 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
Cc: Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/19] gpio: bcm-kona: make use of raw_spinlock variants
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com> wrote:
> Is such API use change well accepted by the open source community already?
The raw_*spinlock APIs are in the kernel header files and used at several
sites in the kernel, so yes.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists