[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaVqsZ0dogiC7KX4Vyax7KugJoaLNAXdXowt=w9y=MfdA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 11:13:27 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/19] pinctrl: sirf: atlas7: make use of raw_spinlock variants
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Julia Cartwright <julia@...com> wrote:
> The sirf atlas7 pinctrl drivers currently implement an irq_chip for
> handling interrupts; due to how irq_chip handling is done, it's
> necessary for the irq_chip methods to be invoked from hardirq context,
> even on a a real-time kernel. Because the spinlock_t type becomes a
> "sleeping" spinlock w/ RT kernels, it is not suitable to be used with
> irq_chips.
>
> A quick audit of the operations under the lock reveal that they do only
> minimal, bounded work, and are therefore safe to do under a raw spinlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>
Patch applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists