lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58C9167F.5030905@rock-chips.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:25:03 +0800
From:   jeffy <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
To:     Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Mark Yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>
CC:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/rockchip: Refactor the component match logic.

Hi Andrzej,


On 03/14/2017 08:05 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Hi Jeffy,
>
> On 14.03.2017 11:45, Jeffy Chen wrote:
>> Currently we are adding all components from the dts, if one of their
>> drivers been disabled, we would not be able to bring up others.
>>
>> Refactor component match logic, follow exynos drm.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
>
> Below few nitpicks.
>
> (...)
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
>> index b360e62..b6bccfc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
>> @@ -356,34 +356,52 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops rockchip_drm_pm_ops = {
>>   				rockchip_drm_sys_resume)
>>   };
>>
>> -static int compare_of(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> -{
>> -	struct device_node *np = data;
>> +static struct platform_driver *rockchip_drm_comp_drvs[] = {
>> +	&vop_platform_driver,
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_ANALOGIX_DP
>> +	&rockchip_dp_driver,
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_CDN_DP
>> +	&cdn_dp_driver,
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_DW_HDMI
>> +	&dw_hdmi_rockchip_pltfm_driver,
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_DW_MIPI_DSI
>> +	&dw_mipi_dsi_driver,
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_INNO_HDMI
>> +	&inno_hdmi_driver,
>> +#endif
>> +};
>
> To avoid #ifdefs, you can use DRV_PTR [1], but it depends what do you
> hate more? ifdefs or macro magic :)
>
> [1]:
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c#L472
>
Done.
>>
>> -	return dev->of_node == np;
>> +static int compare_dev(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> +{
>> +	return dev == (struct device *)data;
>>   }
>>
>> -static void rockchip_add_endpoints(struct device *dev,
>> -				   struct component_match **match,
>> -				   struct device_node *port)
>> +static struct component_match *rockchip_drm_match_add(struct device *dev)
>>   {
>> -	struct device_node *ep, *remote;
>> +	struct component_match *match = NULL;
>> +	int i;
>>
>> -	for_each_child_of_node(port, ep) {
>> -		remote = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(ep);
>> -		if (!remote || !of_device_is_available(remote)) {
>> -			of_node_put(remote);
>> -			continue;
>> -		} else if (!of_device_is_available(remote->parent)) {
>> -			dev_warn(dev, "parent device of %s is not available\n",
>> -				 remote->full_name);
>> -			of_node_put(remote);
>> -			continue;
>> -		}
>> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rockchip_drm_comp_drvs); i++) {
>> +		struct platform_driver *drv = rockchip_drm_comp_drvs[i];
>> +		struct device *p = NULL, *d;
>>
>> -		drm_of_component_match_add(dev, match, compare_of, remote);
>> -		of_node_put(remote);
>> +		do {
>> +			d = bus_find_device(&platform_bus_type, p, &drv->driver,
>> +					    (void *)platform_bus_type.match);
>> +			put_device(p);
>> +			p = d;
>> +
>> +			if (!d)
>> +				break;
>> +			component_match_add(dev, &match, compare_dev, d);
>> +		} while (true);
>>   	}
>> +
>> +	return match ?: ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>   }
>>
>>   static const struct component_master_ops rockchip_drm_ops = {
>> @@ -391,21 +409,16 @@ static const struct component_master_ops rockchip_drm_ops = {
>>   	.unbind = rockchip_drm_unbind,
>>   };
>>
>> -static int rockchip_drm_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +static int rockchip_drm_platform_of_probe(struct device *dev)
>>   {
>> -	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> -	struct component_match *match = NULL;
>>   	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>>   	struct device_node *port;
>> +	bool found = false;
>>   	int i;
>>
>>   	if (!np)
>>   		return -ENODEV;
>> -	/*
>> -	 * Bind the crtc ports first, so that
>> -	 * drm_of_find_possible_crtcs called from encoder .bind callbacks
>> -	 * works as expected.
>> -	 */
>> +
>>   	for (i = 0;; i++) {
>>   		struct device_node *iommu;
>>
>> @@ -429,9 +442,9 @@ static int rockchip_drm_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   			is_support_iommu = false;
>>   		}
>>
>> +		found = true;
>> +
>>   		of_node_put(iommu);
>> -		drm_of_component_match_add(dev, &match, compare_of,
>> -					   port->parent);
>>   		of_node_put(port);
>>   	}
>>
>> @@ -440,27 +453,27 @@ static int rockchip_drm_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   		return -ENODEV;
>>   	}
>>
>> -	if (!match) {
>> +	if (!found) {
>>   		dev_err(dev, "No available vop found for display-subsystem.\n");
>>   		return -ENODEV;
>>   	}
>> -	/*
>> -	 * For each bound crtc, bind the encoders attached to its
>> -	 * remote endpoint.
>> -	 */
>> -	for (i = 0;; i++) {
>> -		port = of_parse_phandle(np, "ports", i);
>> -		if (!port)
>> -			break;
>>
>> -		if (!of_device_is_available(port->parent)) {
>> -			of_node_put(port);
>> -			continue;
>> -		}
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>>
>> -		rockchip_add_endpoints(dev, &match, port);
>> -		of_node_put(port);
>> -	}
>> +static int rockchip_drm_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +	struct component_match *match = NULL;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = rockchip_drm_platform_of_probe(dev);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	match = rockchip_drm_match_add(dev);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(match))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(match);
>>
>>   	return component_master_add_with_match(dev, &rockchip_drm_ops, match);
>>   }
>> @@ -488,7 +501,60 @@ static struct platform_driver rockchip_drm_platform_driver = {
>>   	},
>>   };
>>
>> -module_platform_driver(rockchip_drm_platform_driver);
>> +static void rockchip_drm_unregister_drivers(void)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	for (i = ARRAY_SIZE(rockchip_drm_comp_drvs) - 1; i >= 0; i--)
>> +		platform_driver_unregister(rockchip_drm_comp_drvs[i]);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rockchip_drm_register_drivers(void)
>> +{
>> +	int i, ret;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rockchip_drm_comp_drvs); i++) {
>> +		ret = platform_driver_register(rockchip_drm_comp_drvs[i]);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			goto err_unreg;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +err_unreg:
>> +	for (; i--; )
>> +		platform_driver_unregister(rockchip_drm_comp_drvs[i]);
>
> Strange placement of decremental in for, maybe sth like this would be
> better:
> 	while (i-- > 0)
> 		platform_driver_unregister(rockchip_drm_comp_drvs[i]);
>
Yes, this looks better.
>
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __init rockchip_drm_init(void)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = rockchip_drm_register_drivers();
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = platform_driver_register(&rockchip_drm_platform_driver);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto err_unreg_drivers;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +err_unreg_drivers:
>> +	rockchip_drm_unregister_drivers();
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __exit rockchip_drm_fini(void)
>> +{
>> +	platform_driver_unregister(&rockchip_drm_platform_driver);
>> +
>> +	rockchip_drm_unregister_drivers();
>> +}
>> +
>> +module_init(rockchip_drm_init);
>> +module_exit(rockchip_drm_fini);
>>
>>   MODULE_AUTHOR("Mark Yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>");
>>   MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ROCKCHIP DRM Driver");
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.h
>> index adc3930..91812bd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.h
>> @@ -79,4 +79,20 @@ void rockchip_drm_dma_detach_device(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
>>   int rockchip_drm_wait_line_flag(struct drm_crtc *crtc, unsigned int line_num,
>>   				unsigned int mstimeout);
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_CDN_DP
>> +extern struct platform_driver cdn_dp_driver;
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_DW_HDMI
>> +extern struct platform_driver dw_hdmi_rockchip_pltfm_driver;
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_DW_MIPI_DSI
>> +extern struct platform_driver dw_mipi_dsi_driver;
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_INNO_HDMI
>> +extern struct platform_driver inno_hdmi_driver;
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_ANALOGIX_DP
>> +extern struct platform_driver rockchip_dp_driver;
>> +#endif
>> +extern struct platform_driver vop_platform_driver;
>>   #endif /* _ROCKCHIP_DRM_DRV_H_ */
>
> I think gcc should be fine if you remove ifdefs. Unused extern
> declarations are ignored, unless you use some paranoic static checker,
> aren't they? But this is also matter of taste.

Ok.
>
>
> Regards
> Andrzej
>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c
>> index 91fbc7b..0da4444 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c
>> @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static int vop_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> -static struct platform_driver vop_platform_driver = {
>> +struct platform_driver vop_platform_driver = {
>>   	.probe = vop_probe,
>>   	.remove = vop_remove,
>>   	.driver = {
>> @@ -412,9 +412,3 @@ static struct platform_driver vop_platform_driver = {
>>   		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(vop_driver_dt_match),
>>   	},
>>   };
>> -
>> -module_platform_driver(vop_platform_driver);
>> -
>> -MODULE_AUTHOR("Mark Yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>");
>> -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ROCKCHIP VOP Driver");
>> -MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>>
>
>
>
>
Thanx for your comments~


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ