linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] iio: accel: adxl345: Setup DATA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:06:18 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>,
        Alison Schofield <amsfield22@...il.com>,
        Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@...g-vd.ch>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] iio: accel: adxl345: Setup DATA_READY trigger

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Eva Rachel Retuya <eraretuya@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 02:12:54PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Eva Rachel Retuya <eraretuya@...il.com> wrote:

> Hello Andy,
> Thanks for the review.

You are welcome!

>> > +static irqreturn_t adxl345_irq(int irq, void *p)
>> > +{
>> > +       struct iio_dev *indio_dev = p;
>> > +       struct adxl345_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>> > +       int ret = IRQ_NONE;
>> > +       u32 int_stat;
>> > +
>>
>> > +       ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, ADXL345_REG_INT_SOURCE, &int_stat);
>>
>> > +       if (ret < 0)
>> > +               return ret;
>>
>> It makes little sense AFAIU.
>>
>
> Can you please elaborate further your comment regarding this?

It's defined as enum and returned value is not in a range.

Also it would be useful to look at kernel/irq/manage.c for the
implementation details.

>> P.S. Are you doing this stuff on your own or you are working for some
>> company? If the latter applies, please, consider to do *internal*
>> review first.

> I'm doing it on my own as a project for Outreachy and have mentors to ask
> for advice and/or questions.

Ah, okay, that is fine then!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko