[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170315021431.13107-5-andi@firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:14:28 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] kref: Remove WARN_ON for NULL release functions
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
The kref functions check for NULL release functions.
This WARN_ON seems rather pointless. We will eventually release and
then just crash nicely. It is also somewhat expensive because
these functions are inlined in a lot of places.
Removing the WARN_ONs saves around 2.3k in this kernel
(likely more in others with more drivers)
text data bss dec hex filename
9083992 5367600 11116544 25568136 1862388 vmlinux-before-load-avg
9070166 5367600 11116544 25554310 185ed86 vmlinux-load-avg
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
---
include/linux/kref.h | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kref.h b/include/linux/kref.h
index f4156f88f557..29220724bf1c 100644
--- a/include/linux/kref.h
+++ b/include/linux/kref.h
@@ -66,8 +66,6 @@ static inline void kref_get(struct kref *kref)
*/
static inline int kref_put(struct kref *kref, void (*release)(struct kref *kref))
{
- WARN_ON(release == NULL);
-
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&kref->refcount)) {
release(kref);
return 1;
@@ -79,8 +77,6 @@ static inline int kref_put_mutex(struct kref *kref,
void (*release)(struct kref *kref),
struct mutex *lock)
{
- WARN_ON(release == NULL);
-
if (refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock(&kref->refcount, lock)) {
release(kref);
return 1;
@@ -92,8 +88,6 @@ static inline int kref_put_lock(struct kref *kref,
void (*release)(struct kref *kref),
spinlock_t *lock)
{
- WARN_ON(release == NULL);
-
if (refcount_dec_and_lock(&kref->refcount, lock)) {
release(kref);
return 1;
--
2.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists