[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170315124024.GA16549@ming.t460p>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 20:40:25 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
"yizhan@...hat.com" <yizhan@...hat.com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: don't complete un-started request in timeout
handler
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 08:18:53PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:07:37AM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>
> > or __blk_mq_requeue_request(). Another issue with this function is that the
>
> __blk_mq_requeue_request() can be run from two pathes:
>
> - dispatch failure, in which case the req/tag isn't released to tag set
>
> - IO completion path, in which COMPLETE flag is cleared before requeue.
>
> so I can't see races with timeout in case of start rq vs. requeue rq.
Actually rq/tag won't be released to tag set if it will be requeued, so
the timeout race is nothing to do with requeue.
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists