[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170315133318.qo7fpoffmyh2chmz@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:33:18 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>, lgirdwood@...il.com,
tiwai@...e.com, patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shengjiu.wang@...escale.com, mihai.serban@....com,
viorel.suman@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8960: Use physical width for bclk
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:19:01AM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:57:02PM +0200, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> > - wm8960->bclk = snd_soc_params_to_bclk(params);
> > + wm8960->bclk = params_physical_width(params) *
> > + params_channels(params) * params_rate(params);
> > if (params_channels(params) == 1)
> > wm8960->bclk *= 2;
> Would quite like to see Mark's thoughts on this. Feels a bit to
> me (although I am not certain) like we are solving the problem in
> the wrong place, isn't this really setting the desired BCLK and
> then in wm8960_configure_clocking we should set the lowest BCLK
> we can that is greater than or equal to the desired.
Exactly, this is the wrong fix in the wrong place - if this is something
we want to do we should be doing it in the shared functions so all
CODECs get the same behaviour but really I think Charles' suggestion
makes more sense.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists