linux-kernel - Re: kbuild/mkspec: Fix architectures where KBUILD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:51:18 -0400
From:   Tom Rini <trini@...sulko.com>
To:     linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: kbuild/mkspec: Fix architectures where KBUILD_IMAGE isn't a full
 path

On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 11:59:22PM +0000, Tom Rini wrote:

> On some architectures, such as arm64, KBUILD_IMAGE is not a full path
> but instead just the build target.  The builddeb script handles this
> case correctly today and will try arch/$ARCH/boot/$KBUILD_IMAGE so we
> can just borrow that logic and adapt it slightly for spec file syntax.
> 
> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>
> Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@...sulko.com>
> ---
> It is currently a mixed-bag on if architectures will use a build target
> (arm, arm64, arc are certainly by inspection and a few others 'may') or
> a full path (x86, blackfin, s390).  Given that builddeb gets this case
> correct, I think changing mkspec is the right way to go here.

I found https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9442211/ today and I see that
it was brought up again just before I sent my patch.  I just want to
point out that 9442211 doesn't address arm, arc, and sh and they will
still not have a functional rpm build target.  This is at least probably
important for arm.  Of course all of those could also be addressed with
a patch similar to 9442211, and my main concern is making sure
everything gets fixed one way or another.  Thanks!

-- 
Tom

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)