lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5070254.AaMND3ln5I@phil>
Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:34:21 +0100
From:   Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     John Keeping <john@...anate.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: rockchip: split out verification of mux settings

Am Montag, 13. März 2017, 18:38:12 CET schrieb John Keeping:
> We need to avoid calling regmap functions from irq handlers, so the next
> commit is going to move the call to rockchip_set_mux() into an
> irq_bus_sync_unlock handler.  But we can't return an error from there so
> we still need to check the settings from rockchip_irq_set_type() and we
> will use this new rockchip_verify_mux() function from there.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@...anate.com>

straightforward separation of the verification code
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ