[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64ef5694-d62d-e14c-ce80-a213c406bf22@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:56:25 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@...il.com>,
Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@...il.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
broonie@...nel.org, Mauro Andreolini <mauro.andreolini@...more.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 10/14] block, bfq: add Early Queue Merge (EQM)
On 03/04/2017 09:01 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
> @@ -6330,7 +7012,41 @@ static void bfq_rq_enqueued(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
>
> static void __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq)
> {
> - struct bfq_queue *bfqq = RQ_BFQQ(rq);
> + struct bfq_queue *bfqq = RQ_BFQQ(rq), *new_bfqq;
> +
> + /*
> + * An unplug may trigger a requeue of a request from the device
> + * driver: make sure we are in process context while trying to
> + * merge two bfq_queues.
> + */
> + if (!in_interrupt()) {
What's the reason for this? Don't use in_interrupt() to guide any of
your decision making here.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists