[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170315172401.35b5owbme4scqfgn@rob-hp-laptop>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:24:01 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Alban <albeu@...e.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] doc: bindings: Add bindings documentation for mtd
nvmem
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 09:26:03AM +0100, Alban wrote:
> Config data for drivers, like MAC addresses, is often stored in MTD.
> Add a binding that define how such data storage can be represented in
> device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alban <albeu@...e.fr>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v2: * Added a "Required properties" section with the nvmem-provider
> property
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mtd-nvmem.txt | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mtd-nvmem.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mtd-nvmem.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mtd-nvmem.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8ed25e6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mtd-nvmem.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> += NVMEM in MTD =
> +
> +Config data for drivers, like MAC addresses, is often stored in MTD.
> +This binding define how such data storage can be represented in device tree.
> +
> +An MTD can be defined as an NVMEM provider by adding the `nvmem-provider`
> +property to their node. Data cells can then be defined as child nodes
> +of the partition as defined in nvmem.txt.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +nvmem-provider: Indicate that the device should be registered as
> + NVMEM provider
I think we should use a compatible string here (perhaps with a
generic fallback), and that can imply it is an nvmem provider. The
reason is then the compatible can also imply other information that
isn't defined in DT.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists